Build
Support, CRM, and finance streams with strict subject patterns and contract schemas.
Dispute, fraud-ops, and finance close loops with traceable evidence chains — audit-friendly dept.* products for regulated evaluators, not chat-only dispute bots.
BFSI remains a top vertical AI budget (ops + compliance). Agents that cannot prove lineage lose RFPs; mesh + FAIR-style product contracts are the differentiator vs chat-only dispute bots.
Build
Support, CRM, and finance streams with strict subject patterns and contract schemas.
Steer
Dispute and incident agents cite ticket + account + optional finance context under policy.
Compound
Audit exports and private evals on resolution quality — not public leaderboard scores.
| Workflow | Buyer pain | Mesh answer |
|---|---|---|
| Dispute / chargeback ops | Evidence scattered across tickets, CRM, and internal tools; model swaps lose history. | Traceable dept.support + account-health narratives with memory advisories under tenancy. |
| Ops incidents (fraud / reliability) | Fraud and platform incidents share symptoms but not a common evidence plane. | Incidents plus engineering change context with link enrich. Optional warehouse or dbt views for close context. |
| Finance close & ops | Month-end context is spreadsheet tribal knowledge. | finance-ops plus warehouse or dbt views without warehouse detours for every agent. |
Disputes and ops incidents need traceable evidence chains — not chat that resets on model swap. Regulated buyers buy lineage and audit, not novelty demos.
Connectors on this map should match /product and /data-products. List the tools. Do not print a readiness label.
Packaged workflows and starting points for this vertical map.